If it looks like a thief...

I am doing the math, and something is not right, here. Why were the delegates from Iowa (33 delegates to Obama), New Hampshire (9 delegates to Clinton), and South Carolina (27 delegates to Obama) counted in full, when their contests were held outside of the window designated in the RBC rules? And I still do not see how it is fair to give any of Clinton's Michigan delegates to Obama.

I am not misinformed or spreading untruths. I am pointing out discrepancies.

Documentary proof of RBC “stop Hillary” corruption found
Posted on June 11, 2008 by plukasiak

A document filed as an exhibit in the Nelson vs Dean Lawsuit that was filed in October 2007 in an attempt to force the DNC to seat the Florida delegation provides indisputable proof that the Democratic National Committee’s Rules and Bylaws Committee singled out Florida and Michigan for sanctions, and ignored violations of Iowa, New Hampshire, and South Carolina.

Read the rest...

Addendum: There are further explanations from the author here and from another reader here.