Biblical Ponderings
Oct. 20th, 2008 01:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
To the woman [God] said, “...Your desire shall be for your husband, And he shall rule over you.”
~Genesis 3:16b, NKJV
In the later years of my identification as an evangelical Christian, I understood this account of God's word to Eve after Adam and she sinned to be a warning: God was warning Eve that because they were no longer sinless, men would oppress women, rather than women and men living and ruling the earth (not each other) as complete equals as Eve and Adam had done up to that point (Genesis 1:27-30). But it was only this afternoon that I realized God made no mention to Adam of a backlash against men because of the way they had oppressed women. It couldn't be because God (as the writer of this account knew God) did not know; according to the Bible, God knows everything. So was that part of God's word left out by the writers (or later editors), who were products of their misogynistic culture? Or, perhaps, did God not say anything to Adam about the inevitable backlash, because he knew Adam's sinful state would not allow him to hear and understand the danger of giving in to that sinful desire to rule over women?
Discuss.
Harsh Choice of Words
Date: 2008-10-22 09:18 pm (UTC)I would argue that anyone who classifies every women who makes that choice as "whiny, bitter, and shrill" is taking an oppressive viewpoint of those women. I can see disagreeing with their choice, but calling them names because of it is overstepping the line.
Re: Harsh Choice of Words
Date: 2008-10-23 04:51 pm (UTC)I'm not talking about every woman who makes that choice. I am specifically talking about the women who make that choice "because of the male ego and men's oppression of women." This presupposes all men are egotistic oppressors, which is patently untrue, and I stand by my statement that such women are whiny, bitter, shrill misandrists and will add that I do not think these women give a damn about other women.