An Ongoing Epiphany
Jul. 19th, 2009 12:50 amI am going to change how I read the Bible. I was trained from a small child to read and consider it God's perfect, infallible, literal word to humankind. For the past few years I have not known what to think, except that it was mostly written and compiled by males for males, who deliberately excluded women in many ways. But this morning I realized I could read it for what it is: certain writers' understanding of the divine, a record of certain people's experiences, and one which was interpreted from the original languages by people (usually male) far removed from the cultures and times in which the original writers lived. I would read any other collection of religious or philosophical writing that way (Upanishads, Koran, Lotus Sutra, etc.). Why not the Bible? Only because of indoctrination, that's why.
I am not a Christian because of the Bible....
I am not a Christian because of the Bible....
no subject
Date: 2009-07-19 08:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-19 10:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-19 11:28 am (UTC)it was one of those classes that the fundies walked out of, but i loved the material and had a wonderful professor. it was both enlightening and refreshing.
no subject
Date: 2009-07-20 10:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 12:39 am (UTC)also, i don't get signing up for a class called "magic witchcraft and religion" then getting affronted when you show up. it seemed pretty clear to me what we were getting!
no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 07:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-21 10:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-22 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-07-25 10:14 pm (UTC)It's true that the Bible is very by-males-for-males-ish... OTOH, there's also other things to notice, if you look for them... For example, in one of the OT books about the laws / the description of the journey of the Israelites thru the desert towards Israel, there's a bit about how certain people had only daughters as inheritors, so those daughters asked if they could keep their late dad's name (or whatever it was exactly) so that that their dad's name wouldn't die out in the promised land... And God agreed to those requests, which shows that at least God isn't "gender biased"... And then there's that one law about if a woman was ravished in the city but didn't cry out for help she was deemed an accomplice or something, but if it happened in the country where it was likely there was no one around to hear her screams for help, she was presumed innocent... So the idea of a presumption of innocence isn't as new-fangled as it's made out to be, sometimes...
no subject
Date: 2009-07-26 02:28 am (UTC)As a woman, that does not give me warm feelings about the god Moses supposedly served.
no warm feelings
Date: 2009-07-28 11:32 pm (UTC)Anyway, if you're open to it, I think that many commandments and whatever in the Old Testament do have their points. Having said that, it's also true that there are certain descriptions of events and even whole books in the OT that either turn my stomach and/or I just plain hate...