I went with the Ilford Delta 100, because I specifically want to compare ISO 100 films. I expect to like the Fujifilm best, because before I switched to digital back in 2005, I liked their amateur films better than Kodak's amateur films; the colors were more vivid, and the price was lower every time.
I finished the Fujifilm today and can hardly wait to have it developed. I'm tickled by the fact that the professional lab can simply develop the negatives without doing prints, or you can get prints for another $9 or so. (I've never used a professional lab, before.) This first time I'll have prints done, but after this I will just let them develop the film and then scan the negatives.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2009-09-26 02:09 am (UTC)I finished the Fujifilm today and can hardly wait to have it developed. I'm tickled by the fact that the professional lab can simply develop the negatives without doing prints, or you can get prints for another $9 or so. (I've never used a professional lab, before.) This first time I'll have prints done, but after this I will just let them develop the film and then scan the negatives.